More Parallel Signal Paths in Tonestack

datainadequate

I was a bit disappointed when I discovered I could not place an ABY unit within the A or B path of an existing ABY unit. Whilst I can understand there may be very good technical reasons for not allowing infinite nesting of ABYs, I would still like a bit more flexibility. Maybe an ABCY, and perhaps even an ABCDY? Also, it would be nice if some effects offered multiple outputs, for instance it would be awesome if PolyOCT had separate outputs for each slider.

panthemusicalgoat

Why do you need more parallel routing and Why would you want seperate outputs on the polyOCT ? Just curious

panthemusicalgoat

Honestly the only thing I'd like added IS (optional since it hogs cpu) stereo pitch shifting maybe so I can remix tracks without summing to mono. Don't know if there's a workaround